“The Democrats & Republicans are both full of s**t..I voted Democratic my entire life & I’m thinking man, everybody in my hometown is still poor. The Black neighborhoods are still poor. They’re going to sh***y schools & we been voting Democratic for 59 years.” Charles Barkley
Since human beings have been around, so has slavery. Contrary to what Critical Race Theory pontificates, the concept of slavery was not created in North America by Europeans. Enslavement covers the Sumerians (the people of southern Mesopotamia whose civilization flourished between c. 4100-1750 BCE.), Egyptians, Romans, the Arabs and the Greeks through modern day human trafficking. The word “slave” comes from “Slav,” referring to the enormous amount of Slavic people who were enslaved during the early Middle Ages in Central Europe. But who gathered the African slaves to be sold? It was,victorious African tribes, who also kept their own slaves. And why has educational curriculum(s) avoided this topic? It doesn’t fit their woke agenda.
For the last number of years the uninformed, radical extremists of the socialist progressive liberal left once again proved that their knowledge of American History is rather paltry and twisted. They harped on regarding common knowledge that a number of The Foundering Fathers were slave owners: George Washington, James Madison, James Monroe and the author of the Declaration of Independence, Thomas Jefferson, for example. The progressive left took to taking down the statues of perceived racist people, including The Foundering Fathers. If you look at world history, the United States is the only country to fully rid itself of slavery, which is still around.
According to lore, as the Declaration of Independence was being ratified, the future Dixiecrats, Democrats from Georgia, North Carolina and South Carolina, led by Edward Rutledge(SC), refused to vote unless the clause regarding slavery was removed. Jefferson knew slavery was inherently wrong despite owning slaves, reluctantly scratched out the words “We hold these truths to be self-evident be that all men are created equal.” So for all these years one thing was overlooked, Jefferson pushed for an embargo on the importation of enslaved Africans, which was outlawed by an act of Congress passed in 1807, and signed into law and was rooted in a passage in the Constitution, which had stipulated that importing enslaved people could be prohibited 25 years after the ratification of the Constitution:
Article 1, Section 9 states: “The migration or importation of such persons as any of the states now existing shall think proper to admit, shall not be prohibited by the Congress prior to the year one thousand eight hundred and eight, but a tax or duty may be imposed on such importation, not exceeding ten dollars for each person.”In other words, the government could not ban the importation of enslaved people for 20 years after the adoption of the Constitution. And as the designated year 1808 approached, those opposed to enslavement began making plans for legislation that would outlaw the trans-Atlantic trade of enslaved people.
The law was finally passed by both houses of Congress on March 2, 1807, and Jefferson signed it into law on March 3, 1807. However, given the restriction imposed by Article I, Section 9 of the Constitution, the law would only become effective on January 1, 1808.
Despite the international ban on the importation of enslaved Africans, Cuba continued to transport captive Africans to its sugar plantations until the 1860s, and Brazil to its coffee plantations until the 1850s.
In 2019, Nikole Hannah-Jones, “author” of the yellow journalistic NY Times’ contentious and very debatable “1619 Project” unbelievably stated, “If you want to see the most equal, multiracial dem… it’s not a democracy—the most equal, multiracial country in our hemisphere, it would be Cuba,” in addition to citing socialism as the reason behind the alleged equality. Equal country? I guess she is failing to see the poverty and mistreatment of the Cuban people, which are the reasons they want to escape. It’s not surprising considering Hannah-Jones’ distorted view of American History and the reasons for The Revolutionary War. The National Pulse published an op-ed by The Oregonian in 2008, in which Hannah-Jones wrote a glowing piece about Cuba’s achievements, in which she said were overlooked by the West because of the prevalent narrative that “Cuba is poor. Cuba is communist. Cuba violates human rights and represses dissent.” All true, so the Cubans can read, but have no rights, no freedom, no internet and had zero interest from Biden-Harris administration. And the NY Times funded 1619 version is just a tad incorrect. But the orthodox, radical, progressive extremists of the socialist liberal left push the 1619 Project as historical gospel, which it ain’t.
In 2019, the leftist leaning rag NY Times began pushing the revisionist program view of American History titled, “The 1619 Project.” The goal was the re-examination of the legacy of slavery in the United States and was timed for the 400th anniversary of the arrival in America of the first enslaved people from West Africa. Yes, Africans did arrive in the American colonies in 1619, but not as slaves.
As a longtime retired educator as a teacher and as an administrator on the elementary level, it was my goal to teach the truth, especially regarding American History. Now with the woke generation of the unhinged, radical, liberal left wanting to destroy our history, and indoctrinating students to hate the country, my face would be on the cover of ultra-liberal publications, while the dregs of the bootlicking, cosmopolitan biased, cultural supremacist mainstream media would rake me over the coals. Sometimes the truth is very hard to swallow. Remember, you can’t pick and choose your history…it already happened!
The unhinged left placed a target on the back of General Robert Edward Lee, Commanding the Army of Northern Virginia during the Civil War. For those of you who are unaware, the Army of N. Virginia fought for the Confederate States of America. Former Senator Joe Biden (D-DEL) voted to restore the Confederate general’s citizenship early in his Senate career. In 1975, Biden joined a unanimous Senate vote to restore citizenship to Lee, 110 years after the Virginian surrendered his Army of Northern Virginia to the Union Lt. General and future President Ulysses S. Grant. There were ten nays in the House of Representatives, which came after a discovery in the National Archives that Lee’s post-Civil War Oath of Allegiance, a necessary condition for his citizenship, had never reached President Andrew Johnson. Lee’s 1865 request for citizenship was approved by Grant, but it did not include the oath of allegiance to the U.S., which was necessary for a pardon and his citizenship. During the Civil War, the citizenship of Confederates had been revoked. Biden also pushed for the reinstatement of Confederate President Jefferson Davis’ citizenship.
By the way, since the United States Military Academy at West Point was organized in 1802, General Lee, Class of 1829, did not receive a single demerit during his four years as a cadet. And remains the only cadet to do so! During the Mexican-American War, Lee was a lieutenant in the engineers, which means he was in construction and located mines for removal. He was promoted to captain. Lee was also the commandant at West Point for two years. He upgraded the curriculum and the dormitories, which until then only have stoves for heat. When the Civil War broke out, President Abraham Lincoln offered Lee command of the Federal Army. Lee unhappily declined, stating that he had to fight for his country, Virginia. In prior times if you asked someone what country they were from, they would say the state. Don’t forget that Lee was also against slavery.
As for the question of slavery, in 1619, approximately 19 Africans arrived in Jamestown, Virginia. They were transported by representatives of the Dutch East India Company, who had seized them from a Spanish slave ship. While under Spanish control, African slaves were usually Baptized under orders from the Crown. During that time period, it was an English custom to acknowledge that Baptized Christians were exempt from slavery. Therefore, the colonies treated these Africans as indentured servants. They joined about 1,000 English indentured servants already in the colony. And were eventually granted their freedom.
In 1664, the Dutch brought the first slaves to what became French Guyana. The French regained control of Guyana in 1674. It is generally believed the first group of African slaves was brought by Dutch settlers who migrated from Tobago from as early as the mid-17th century, which is about the same time Irish political prisoners were sent to the American Colonies. By the 1660s, the enslaved population numbered about 2,500. During auctions, slaves were supposed to jump and wave their arms and legs. They were shamelessly treated as dumb animals. As plantations expanded on the coast of Guyana, more enslaved Africans were brought from West Africa in ships owned by the West India Company. Africans who worked the fields were considered the lowest group, even though some of them had special skills. There were the factory workers who worked in the sugar-boiling process. Higher up were the artisan people, such as blacksmiths, carpenters and masons, who were often hired out by the planters. And the caste system further divided the slaves by the color tone of their skin. The Caribbean Islands became immensely valuable with the development of sugar as a cash crop, as opposed to the South’s “King Cotton.” Sugar was produced on extraordinarily brutal plantations using slave labor. Their working conditions were brutal. Harsh conditions, dangerous animals, little medical care, brutal guards, and backbreaking labor led many to die in them. If someone in the mill was grinding sugar and their arm got caught under the gristwheel, their arms were chopped off, in order to prevent the wheel from jamming. The mortality rate was high, and the dismal conditions led to more than half a dozen slave rebellions. So, in the mid 17th Century it appears that slavery did not burst onto the American Colonies.
Furthermore, slaves in the United States had a walk through the park compared to the people in Guyana.
Due to the fact that the Africans were considered indentured servants, they were freed after a prescribed period, given the use of land and supplies by their former masters. No mention of this by the unhinged, orthodox, extremist liberal left demanding reparations. For example, Anthony Johnson (1600-1670) arrived in Virginia in 1621 from Angola as an indentured servant. He became free and a property owner, eventually buying and owning slaves himself. The shift of Africans from indentured servitude to slaves did not happen overnight.
In the mid 17th century, there were no laws regarding slavery in Virginia’s history. But, in 1640, a Virginia court sentenced African John Punch to slavery after he attempted to flee his indentured service. The two whites with whom he attempted to flee with were sentenced to an additional year of their indentured servitude, and three years’ service to the colony. This marked the first court sanctioning of legalized slavery in the English colonies and was one of the first legal distinctions made between Europeans and Africans.
What is overlooked is that the first true slaves in the American colonies were children from Ireland in 1619. Additionally, the Irish slave trade truly began when King James II sold 30,000 Irish political prisoners as slaves to the New World. His Proclamation of 1625 required Irish political prisoners be sent overseas and sold to English settlers in the West Indies. By the mid 1600s, the Irish were the main slaves sold to Antigua and Montserrat. At that time, 70% of the total population of Montserrat were Irish slaves. Additional Irish slaves were sent by Oliver Cromwell and King Charles I, totaling over 500K. It seems that Irish slaves were less expensive than African slaves and were treated more harshly at that time.
By 1830, there were approximately 319,599 free Blacks in the United States. Approximately 13.7 per cent of the total Black population was free. A significant number of these free Blacks were the owners of slaves. The 1830 US Census lists 3,775 free Blacks who owned a total of 12,760 slaves.
One of the lesser well known aspects of the history of slavery is how many and how often non-whites owned and traded slaves in early America. Free Black slave holders could be found at one time or another “in each of the thirteen original states and later in every state that countenanced slavery,” historian R. Halliburton Jr. observed. Black people bought and sold other Black people.William Ellison (April 1790 – December 5, 1861) was a very wealthy Black plantation owner and cotton gin manufacturer who lived in South Carolina. According to the 1860 census (in which his surname was listed as “Ellerson”), he owned 63 Black slaves, making him the largest of the 171 Black slaveholders in South Carolina, but far from the largest overall slave holder in the state.
Moreover, the American History that is being taught in American schools today portrays anyone who lived in the South during the Antebellum Period, which was from the late 18th century until the start of the Civil War in April, 1861, and was marked by the economic growth of the South through an agricultural industry, as a slave owner . The schools are saying that everyone owned at least one slave, which is absolutely incorrect. It was expensive to own one slave, while most of the land owners were poor dirt, barefoot farmers. Less than one-tenth of Southerners owned at least one slave, while half of that 1/10 owned more than one. From a pure economic standpoint, it was expensive to feed, clothe, house and provide medical care for another person.
What’s interesting is that any Democrat worth their salt should look up these following Democratic people: Edward Rutledge, Preston Brooks, Andrew Butler, Roger Taney, Fernando Wood, Nathan Bedford Forrest, Woodrow Wilson, Franklin Roosevelt, Robert Byrd, Lyndon Baines Johnson, Theophilus “Bull” Connor, George Wallace and the current standard bearer for systemic racism, Joe Biden: “If you don’t vote for me, you ain’t Black.”It’s easy to make the guess that the aforementioned names are people who are Democrats. What is more interesting is that one person signed the Declaration of Independence. Another was a pro-slavery Democrat from South Carolina who nearly caned to death abolitionist Senator Charles Sumner(R-MASS). You have the Chief Justice of the Supreme Court, three Presidents and a Governor from Alabama, who stated, “Segregation now, segregation forever.” The Senator from West Virginia who mentored Bubba and Hillary Clinton, was a Klansman. And speaking of the KKK, the first Wizard is listed here. The Klan, with support of Southern Democrats, suppressed voting rights of Blacks and Republicans in the South through violence and intimidation during the elections of 1868. And included in this group is a former Mayor of NYC who threatened that New York would succeed from the Union if the 13th Amendment was ratified while he was a member of The Congress. Don’t forget that DementiaJoe called the first Black governor of Maryland, “Boy,” during a speech.
Additionally, during the tenure of President Wilson, a staunch progressive, the country saw a rebirth of the Klan after Wilson endorsed the 1915 film “Birth of a Nation,” to go along with the enforcement of the Jim Crow laws in Washington, DC. And speaking of the Klan, let’s not forget about the 1924 Democratic Convention at NYC’s Madison Square Garden, called “The Klanbake,” as they marched down Broadway. Let’s not forget FDR’s internment camps, such as Manzanar, for American citizens of Japanese descent during WWII. Furthermore, Pelosi’s father, Thomas Ludwig John D’Alesandro Jr., as the Mayor of Baltimore, dedicated many statues celebrating the Confederacy throughout the city. There is further evidence of the Democrat deceit and skullduggery about being the party for minorities.
Since the unhinged radical extremists of the socialist, liberal left are demanding reparations for something they never had to experience, the descendants of the alleged slave owners cannot be held responsible for the sins of the past.
The last thing to consider is that no one alive today either was a slave or slave owner. What will be the determining factors as to whom gets paid by whom, how much and where does the reparations come from? One person who should be asked is CNN’s own Anderson Cooper. His great, great, great grandfather, tycoon Corneilus Vanderbilt, owned a plantation in Alabama with a plethora of slaves; including former FLOTUS Michelle Obama’s great, great, great grandfather. Obviously, Cooper wasn’t alive as Vanderbilt owned slaves. Is he responsible for what occurred? No! A person from 150 years ago cannot be judged by today’s standards. Their accomplishments cannot be forgotten.
If there are to be reparations, the families of the 450,000 Union soldiers who gave their lives for the abolition of slavery should be first in line. Second in line should be the Union soldiers who received wounds, which resulted in amputations that affected the remainder of their lives. Third in line should be the Union soldiers who were psychologically damaged, or PTSD before it was identified, for the remainder of their lives. Next, the Federal Government should be reimbursed for the execution of the war. Lastly, the descendants of President Abraham Lincoln should also receive reparations for the assassination of the President. Then take on additional reparations for the affects of the Civil War on Mary Todd Lincoln and her children. Finally, Robert Lincoln should receive reparations for all the horrors he experienced in his life.
As for CRT, the goal of “critical race theory” is to replace the American idea of equal rights of individuals with the revolutionary idea of unequal rights based on identity. Everything is identity politics…claiming victim hood…claiming necessary reparations! And as for reparations, what about the 2,000+ sailors of England’s Royal Navy who gave their lives to stop slavery in the late 1700’s to the 1830’s?
The “1619 Project,” as the special issue of the August 18, 2019, New York Times Magazine was called, demonized white people and provided an excuse for indoctrinated, intolerant, radical, orthodox progressive, socialist white masochists to engage in literal boot-licking and self-destructive statue toppling of ancestral “oppressors.” History was attacked because it didn’t fit the narratives of perceived “victimization” in America. But never addressed is the manner in which Africans became slaves and why. Look it up!
So, after re-reading my research into American History from 1619 on, I took it upon myself to see if Hannah-Jones was correct in anyway shape or form. Turns out she was more like Hannah-Barberra, the geniuses behind The Flintstones, The Jetsons, Scooby-Doo and Yogi Bear. So, ask yourself who has had the more credible career…Hannah-Jones or Hannah-Barberra? I will answer the question this way: Yabba-Dabba-Do!
A Coherent Observation 